If we assume that the commonly accpeted idea about early man is correct, that men were hunters and women gatherers, I wonder how much of that was simply because men are much more likely to be colour-blind, and therefore have a harder time differentiating bewteen poisonous and non-poisonous gathered food.

From: [identity profile] kalivor.livejournal.com


I would think that it was because the women would need to breast feed the baby, and babies have a higher survival rate when brought gathering, as opposed to hunting ...

From: [identity profile] djinnthespazz.livejournal.com


Oh, no... that wasn't derisive laughter - that was survival of the species laughter...

It's pretty much a miracle we've made it this far.

And I like hearing about the weird stuff in other people's heads. It's a good way to stretch my brain a little.

From: [identity profile] djinnthespazz.livejournal.com


And the designers of the on-line game should throw a background texture behind the colors, so that the distinction is clear even if you don't catch the colors. That's a simple fix, without changing the game board much at all for those who are accustomed to it's current look.

From: [identity profile] alison-in-oh.livejournal.com


The only place color might come in to play is berries, right? Red is often bad, white is almost always bad, blues and purples tend to be OK.

Well, my color-blind husband can see blue against green like nobody's business. We'll be out berry picking and he's like, there's a huge patch of blueberries! I can't even see them till I'm closer.

Conversely, he doesn't see and walks right by patches of brilliant red lowbush cranberries.

Is this, perhaps, a counterexample for your theory? :D

(In Jean Auel's books, the strict division of labor was part of the downfall of early man leading to the rise of modern man...)
.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags