I dunno, I said "hollywood" horror... Bats was meant to be a blockbuster, big deal kind of film, or at least was marketed as such. It was worse than highlander endgame. By far. While there are worse horror movies, this one was a "big hollywood production", and so should have had at least half decent special effects, instead of paper cut out bats. This was a step above a student film, but without any of the charm. It's like a Roger Corman movie, but worse, because it should know better.
OK ... maybe I've just been insulated by all the stuff that I'm used to watching. Bats really didn't seem all that bad, and was certainly more watchable than Highlander: Endgame.
Of course, Beyond Reanimator is in production, and should be released upon an unsuspecting public sometime next year, so Bats might not hold your top spot for long ...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
Anyone who is over on a semi-regular basis to watch the movies that the Wiff likes to rent can confirm this ...
Besides, there's always the latest Highlander movie, whatever it was called.
From:
no subject
From:
Re:
Of course, Beyond Reanimator is in production, and should be released upon an unsuspecting public sometime next year, so Bats might not hold your top spot for long ...